**announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata |

Date |
Tue, 14 May 2013 00:24:08 +0100 |

I don't know what you understand here by "like regression" but formats assigned by -format- are by definition display formats and have no effect on what is stored and therefore no effect on the results of calculation. Among other arguments, numeric formats controlling the number of decimal places shown in displays have no bearing on the binary representation of numbers. There are many discussions, including http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0067 Nick njcoxstata@gmail.com On 13 May 2013 22:11, Wu Zhang <wuzhang50@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Thanks! > > By the way, does the format change the calculation results, like regression? > > ________________________________ > From: Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> > > Please note: "Stata", "Mata", as at > > http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/#spell > > What you see is is likely just to be a side-effect of different > default formats. You can arrange the same format. Look at -help > format-. > > . sysuse auto > (1978 Automobile Data) > > . gen gpm = 1/mpg > > . list gpm in 1/10 > > +----------+ > | gpm | > |----------| > 1. | .0454545 | > 2. | .0588235 | > 3. | .0454545 | > 4. | .05 | > 5. | .0666667 | > |----------| > 6. | .0555556 | > 7. | .0384615 | > 8. | .05 | > 9. | .0625 | > 10. | .0526316 | > +----------+ > > . mata > ------------------------------------------------- mata (type end to > exit) --------------- > > : gpm2 = st_data(., "gpm") > > : gpm2[(1..10)] > 1 > +---------------+ > 1 | .0454545468 | > 2 | .0588235296 | > 3 | .0454545468 | > 4 | .0500000007 | > 5 | .0666666701 | > 6 | .055555556 | > 7 | .0384615399 | > 8 | .0500000007 | > 9 | .0625 | > 10 | .0526315793 | > +---------------+ > > : strofreal(gpm2[(1..10)], "%5.4f") > 1 > +----------+ > 1 | 0.0455 | > 2 | 0.0588 | > 3 | 0.0455 | > 4 | 0.0500 | > 5 | 0.0667 | > 6 | 0.0556 | > 7 | 0.0385 | > 8 | 0.0500 | > 9 | 0.0625 | > 10 | 0.0526 | > +----------+ > > : end > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > . format gpm %5.4f > > . list gpm in 1/10 > > +--------+ > | gpm | > |--------| > 1. | 0.0455 | > 2. | 0.0588 | > 3. | 0.0455 | > 4. | 0.0500 | > 5. | 0.0667 | > |--------| > 6. | 0.0556 | > 7. | 0.0385 | > 8. | 0.0500 | > 9. | 0.0625 | > 10. | 0.0526 | > +--------+ > > Nick > njcoxstata@gmail.com > > > On 13 May 2013 07:50, Wu Zhang <wuzhang50@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I have a variable list which has different digits after being imported into MATA; I take a snap of the whole picture: >> >> In stata: >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> 1. 9.477003 8.210668 59.375 -2.00877 >> 2. 9.34036 9.473704 66.0647 -1.543392 >> 3. 8.986102 8.188967 53.92946 -.5894488 >> 4. 9.285332 9.773379 73.92938 -.2278635 >> 5. 9.286468 9.812742 57.82097 -.0813199 >> >> >> >> While in MATA: >> 1 9.477003098 8.21066761 59.375 -2.008770227 >> 2 9.340359688 9.473704338 66.0647049 -1.54339242 >> 3 8.986102104 8.188966751 53.92946243 -.5894488096 >> 4 9.285331726 9.773379326 73.92938232 -.2278635055 >> 5 9.286467552 9.812742233 57.82096863 -.0813199058 >> >> >> Note that what we see in STATA is the same as in the data editor view. >> >> >> I am just wondering whether there is a way to make them the same? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata***From:*Wu Zhang <wuzhang50@yahoo.com>

**References**:**st: digits difference between stata and mata***From:*Wu Zhang <wuzhang50@yahoo.com>

**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata***From:*Wu Zhang <wuzhang50@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Problem with variable names using Insheet** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata** - Index(es):