Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: multiple indirect effects with binary mediators


From   William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: multiple indirect effects with binary mediators
Date   Tue, 7 May 2013 08:51:35 -0700

What were the problems you encountered in Mplus?  Maybe they are indicative of a larger underlying problem with fitting the model you are interested in.  Do you know how reliably your binary indicator is measured and whether or not it is derived from some underlying continuous variable?

There could be other ways to address things, but given the complexity of your model it would be helpful to know more about your data.

HTH,
Billy

Sent from my iPhone

On May 7, 2013, at 6:56, "Muehleck, Kai" <Muehleck@his.de> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I would like to estimate the direct indirect effects of an independent variable. Some of the mediating variables are binary, some are continuous. The dependent variable is continuous (natural logarithm of income). There are some packages allowing for binary mediators (medeff, ldecomp), however as I understand none of them allow for specifying multiple indirect effects in the sense of subsequent mediating variables. 
> 
> What do I mean by that? Theoretical considerations suggest that one group of mediators influences the other group of mediators. Thus the MVs influence the DV subsequently: 
> 
> IV -> MV1 -> MV2 -> DV.
> 
> In this model the total effect of the IV would be made up of the direct effect (IV -> DV) and three indirect effects:
> 
> (1) IV -> MV1 -> DV; 
> (2) IV -> MV2 -> DV; 
> (3) IV -> MV1 -> MV2 -> DV;
> 
> MV1 is binary. MV2 is continous (but far from  normally distributed with 75% of all respondents on value 0 and the rest distributed across a long positively skewed tail). The DV is continous as well and close to normally distributed. 
> 
> My questions are:
> 
> (1) How can I estimate the direct and indirect effects of the IV?
> 
> (2) How can I estimate the different indirect effects of MV1 and MV2 and their total effects?
> 
> Obviously this asks for some kind of path analysis. However, Stata's sem command only allows for continuous DVs (and continuous MVs I suppose). I have also tried to do this using Mplus but ran into several other problems I couldn't yet solve. Thus I'm again trying to explore Stata's potential to do such an analysis.
> 
> Any help and hints highly appreciated!
> 
> Best regards,
> Kai
> 
> 
> 
> HIS Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH
> Goseriede 9 | 30159 Hannover | www.his.de
> Dr. Kai Mühleck
> HIS-Institut für Hochschulforschung
> Arbeitsbereich Steuerung, Finanzierung, Evaluation
> Internationale Studien & Projektakquise
> Telefon +49 (0)511 1220-456 | Fax +49 (0)511 1220-431
> E-Mail muehleck@his.de 
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 6489
> Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Phys. Wolfgang Körner
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Andreas Geiger
> 
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index