Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Rebecca Pope <rebecca.a.pope@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: esttab |

Date |
Thu, 2 May 2013 09:38:49 -0500 |

James, The -esttab- syntax that I sent should give you want: coefficient estimates & standard errors to 3 significant digits. + for p < 0.1, * for p< 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, *** for p < 0.001. Did you test the command? If so & it didn't produce the output that you wanted, what is missing? Regards, Rebecca On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:07 AM, James Bernard <jamesstatalist@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Rebecca, > > by p() I meant the precision level at which Stata would assign the > stars. But since p-values are calculated at 3-digit level, then it > really does not matter if I declare this > > I want the beta at 3-digit level, se (that is, I don't want t- ratios) > also at 3-digit precision level and I want stata to show a sign for > <0.1 level of significance (using the dagger sign or + here) > > How can I accommodate these in -esttab? > > Thanks, > James > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Rebecca Pope <rebecca.a.pope@gmail.com> wrote: >> James, >> I'm confused by p(3). Did you mean se(3) since you are requesting the >> standard errors? Or do you want to see p-values and significance >> stars? >> >> If (3) was misstyped, you shouldn't have any trouble with >> esttab m1, b(3) se(3) star(+ 0.1 * 0.05 ** 0.01 *** 0.001) >> >> However, if you want to see standard errors and p-values, -esttab- >> won't accomodate you. It only allows 2 lines per cell. >> >> -esttab- is just a wrapper for -estout- though. You have the option to >> request standard errors and p-values from -estout-. >> estout m1, cells(b(fmt(%12.3fc) star) se(fmt(%12.3fc)) p(fmt(%4.3f))) >> starlevels(+ 0.1 * 0.05 ** 0.01 *** 0.001) >> >> You'll obviously need to adjust the name of your model (m1) and the >> format of b and se to accomodate your data. >> >> Please note that -estout-, of which -esttab- and -eststo- are >> components, is a user-written program and you are asked to cite such >> programs when you post. >> >> For others, -estout-, by Ben Jann, is available from SSC. >> >> Regards, >> Rebecca >> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:15 AM, James Bernard <jamesstatalist@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been trying to use eststo and esttab. The problem is that I am >>> trying to do a few simultaneous changes to the way the output is >>> displayed. >>> >>> 1- showing S.E. instead of t ratio >>> >>> 2- significance display by using -star(+ 0.1 * 0.05 ** 0.01 *** 0.001) >>> >>> 3- limiting the number of digits to 3 by using b(3) and p(3) >>> >>> but, the command does not accommodate these options together: [ only >>> one allowed of z, se, p, ci, and aux()] >>> >>> How can I impose all of these changes simultaneously? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> James >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: esttab***From:*James Bernard <jamesstatalist@gmail.com>

**Re: st: esttab***From:*Rebecca Pope <rebecca.a.pope@gmail.com>

**Re: st: esttab***From:*James Bernard <jamesstatalist@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: comparing regression coefficients across two models with the same dependent variables** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: comparing regression coefficients across two models with the same dependent variables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: esttab** - Next by thread:
**st: From: Abekah Nkrumah <ankrumah@gmail.com>** - Index(es):