Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: equivalence of log-logistic survival estimation with gllamm


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: equivalence of log-logistic survival estimation with gllamm
Date   Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:13:48 -0400

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good that you seem to be making progress.
>
> Just to comment on a side detail: I see no grounds for thinking that
> cloglog link implies a discrete response. In principle, it could make
> sense for continuous proportions too. As I recall, the original
> application (R.A. Fisher, no less) was for precisely this purpose.

I know Fisher invented the cloglog link, but I didn't know it was for
a continuous proportion. Yes absolutely it makes sense.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index