Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Simple slope analysis for non-linear models

From   Ebru Ozturk <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: Simple slope analysis for non-linear models
Date   Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:17:34 +0300

No there is one interaction term which interacts a dummy variable with a continuous variable but continuous variable takes the values from 0 to 10. 

Thank you for your response. There are written formulas for Logit models but I guess it does not work for Tobit.

I hope I dont do it wrong. 

Yes the articles use Tobit do not refer which type of interpretation they make.


> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:30:22 +0100
> Subject: Re: st: Simple slope analysis for non-linear models
> From:
> To:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Ebru Ozturk wrote:
> >I followed your suggestion and it seems that I want this derivative E( y |X, y ≥ 0).
> ok
> > In my model, I have one interaction term (dummy X continuous-ranges from 0 to 10) and other Xs.
> This is sentence full of contradicotry statements: Do you have one or
> many interaction terms? Is your key variable a single indicator
> (dummy) variable, 10 indicator variables, or continuous?
> >I would like to plot the values of true interaction effect and implied z-statistic value at each observation. After doing that I would like to show the value and significance of X’s marginal effect at selected values of the moderator Z (low, mean and high). I use Stata 10.
> There is no such thing as a "true interaction effect". I presume you
> are looking for a cross partial derivative or discrete difference
> (depending on whether your variables are continous or categorical). As
> far as I know there is no program that does this kind of computation
> for -tobit-, so you'll need the general purpose commands -predictnl-
> and -adjust- for that in Stata 10. So, you'll need to look up the
> appropriate formulas and probably do the derivatives yourself. For
> such computations I often combine doing the derivations by hand and
> using <>. After those computations you can
> feed the results to -predictnl- or -adjust-.
> I realize you would have liked the answer to be in the form of a
> command rather than some general tips on how to write a program that
> does what you want to do. But if no one wrote the program before, then
> that is the only answer possible. I could have written the program for
> you, but that is too big time investment on my part. I only do things
> like that if I am also interested in that problem. In this case I
> consider this way of thinking about interaction terms a dead end, so I
> am not going to invest time in it.
> > But the problem is in journals I use they never mention which Tobit intepretation they implement so that's why I am struggling.
> So they report differences/changes in predicted outcome without
> defining what the outcome is? That seems a bit problematic to me.
> Hope this helps,
> Maarten
> ---------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Reichpietschufer 50
> 10785 Berlin
> Germany
> ---------------------------------
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> * 		 	   		  
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index