Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Is there a better way of allocating individuals into different categories based on the probability of an event?


From   Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: Is there a better way of allocating individuals into different categories based on the probability of an event?
Date   Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:16:04 +0200

Dear Stata-listers,

Is there a better way of executing the code below which assigns
individuals into the Non-smoker and Smoker categories based on the
probability of smoking in pregnancy?

****0=Non-smoker, 1=Smoker***
**** Assuming 84% of women do not smoke during pregnancy
**** Johnston V, Thomas DP, McDonnell J, Andrews RM. Maternal smoking
and smoking in the household during pregnancy and postpartum: findings
from an Indigenous cohort in the Northern Territory. Med J Aust. 2011
May 16;194(10):556-9.
gen smoker1=int(1+(50000-1)*runiform())
gen smoker=0 if smoker1 < 42000
replace smoker=1 if smoker1 >= 42000
label define smoker_label 0"Non-smoker" 1"Smoker"
label values smoker smoker_label
label variable smoker "Smoking status"
drop smoker1

Kind regards,
Gwinyai
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index