Re: st: bifactor rotation

["JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Airey, David C
<david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>
> Here was a reference:
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253271/pdf/nihms341216.pdf

Good reference. The complexity I was remembering was for the higher
order factor analysis (Leiman-Schmid transformation). Obviously you
can set things up in -sem- as a confirmatory model.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/