Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bifactor rotation


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: bifactor rotation
Date   Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:02:06 -0400

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Airey, David C
<david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>
> Here was a reference:
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253271/pdf/nihms341216.pdf

Good reference. The complexity I was remembering was for the higher
order factor analysis (Leiman-Schmid transformation). Obviously you
can set things up in -sem- as a confirmatory model.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index