Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: test difference in marginal effects for the same dummy variable, computed first as difference and then as derivative |

Date |
Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:18:57 +0100 |

> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Luca Fumarco wrote: >> I would like to test whether the difference between the marginal effects of a dummy varaible, obtained first by computing the difference >> and then by taking the derivative, is statistically significant. I want to implement this test in order to justify the utilization of the derivative. The model I am suing is the probit model Statistical testing involves a very specific logic: there is uncertainty in a estimate because, and only because, you have drawn a random sample from a population and have not looked at the entire population. The test tries to quantify this uncertainty by imagining a population in which a null hypothesis is true, and than compute the probability of drawing a sample from that hypothetical population which deviates from the null hypothesis at least as much as the observed data. What you want to do is compare two models (marginal effects as either difference or derivatives) of your model (probit). Both are wrong as they are models, so by definition simplifications of "reality"(*), and a simplification is just another word for "wrong in some useful way". So the real question is how to compare the usefulness of both models. Statistical testing cannot help you with that; its logic is just not relevant for what you intend to do. Instead you should just look at both marginal effects and see if they are different in a meaningful way. Hope this helps, Maarten (*) "reality" is a bit weird in this context as marginal effects are models of models. So in this case "reality" is the probit model, which in turn is a model of your data. --------------------------------- Maarten L. Buis WZB Reichpietschufer 50 10785 Berlin Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl --------------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: test difference in marginal effects for the same dummy variable, computed first as difference and then as derivative***From:*Luca Fumarco <luca.fumarco@lnu.se>

**Re: st: test difference in marginal effects for the same dummy variable, computed first as difference and then as derivative***From:*Joerg Luedicke <joerg.luedicke@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Graphing multiple cdf's in the same graph (using either -distplot- or -cdfplot-)** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: high correlation interaction & main effect** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: test difference in marginal effects for the same dummy variable, computed first as difference and then as derivative** - Next by thread:
**st: Graphing multiple cdf's in the same graph (using either -distplot- or -cdfplot-)** - Index(es):