Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: Midas

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: Midas
Date   Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:35:12 +0000

Claudia, Setor:

Please heed requests in the FAQ:

0. "does not seem to be working" could mean about 20 different things.
Please spell out your evidence.

1. Explain where user-written commands you refer to come from
(-metan-, -midas-?).

2. Don't use obscure references that are likely to be unclear to many

3. "Stata", not "STATA".

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Setor Kunutsor <> wrote:

> Have a look at the help file for metan and let me know if it helps
> .help metan

> I am trying to use MIDAS for a systematic review.
> The command:
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor ford
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor
> midas tp fp fn tn, ford
> does not seem to be working. I am trying to get a similar output to Revman with the description of the studies on the left and then the forest plot for sensitivity and specificity on the right.
> I am using STATA 12.
> Does anyone have experience with this and can help?
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index