Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Zero-inflated negative binomial panel model


From   James Bernard <jamesstatalist@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Zero-inflated negative binomial panel model
Date   Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:19:28 +0800

Thanks Maarten,

it sounds like a reasonable idea why the method is not there



On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM, James Bernard wrote:
>> I looked at the -zinb-
>>
>> As I said, I have done the search. But, I wonder why it is not there. Any idea?
>
> A zero inflated negative binomial tries to extract quite a lot of
> information from quite subtle features in the data and the same is
> true for panel models. I would not be surprised that combining the two
> would lead to a model that would just be too fragile to be of
> practical use.
>
> -- Maarten
>
> ---------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> WZB
> Reichpietschufer 50
> 10785 Berlin
> Germany
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> ---------------------------------
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index