Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Ksmirnov one-sided test interpretation |

Date |
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:58:37 -0500 |

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Tsankova, Teodora <TsankovT@ebrd.com> wrote: > Thank you Joerg, for your comment. I am using the test not as an > equality of distributions check but as an one-sided (inequality) check. There is a specialist literature on this topic but it's kind of all over the place from what little I know. > In my case I want to check whether a parameter is higher than a random > uniform distribution would suggest. So, I basically need to prove that > its values are higher than if they were chosen at random in the range > observed. I am not using a simple ttest because I would like to prove > that not only the mean is higher but that also all the values tend to be > higher than the uniform distribution. Also, it is difficult to deduct > this information from the CDF graphs as I have a limited number of > observations which are sometime above and sometimes below the 45 degree > line which would represent the random uniform distribution. > > That being said, most of the interpretation of the KS test are for a > two-sided test and this is why I have trouble making conclusions. Sounds like you're interested in the question of stochastic dominance. The KS test is likely to have very low power for that because its alternative is so vague, but if you want to work with it I'd suggest getting a classical nonparametric statistics book such as Gibbons & Chakraborti as I believe this kind of question could be answered by inverting a one-sample KS test to generate an appropriate one-sided confidence interval. There's a literature on this kind of question and in general you can map stochastic dominance to an ROC analysis. for which there are some nice tools in Stata already, such as -rocgold- and associated postestimation. But this is definitely a specialist literature. As I recall many of the easy methods end up failing pretty badly in certain circumstances. Gibbons, J. D., and S. Chakraborti. 2011. Nonparametric Statistical Inference. 5th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. -- JVVerkuilen, PhD jvverkuilen@gmail.com "It is like a finger pointing away to the moon. Do not concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory." --Bruce Lee, Enter the Dragon (1973) * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Ksmirnov one-sided test interpretation***From:*"Tsankova, Teodora" <TsankovT@ebrd.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: RE: network Stata** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: margins after stcox with time-dependent covariate** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Ksmirnov one-sided test interpretation** - Next by thread:
**st: Ksmirnov one-sided test interpretation** - Index(es):