Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-
Date
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:37:00 -0500
FYI I ran the crossed models:
xtmixed Score, || _all: R.Rator, covariance(identity) || Application:,
covariance(independent) reml variance
xtmixed Score if Rator != 4, || _all: R.Rator, covariance(identity) ||
Application:, covariance(independent) reml variance
And got ICC estimates of 0.61 and 0.22, respectively, which are
essentially the same as for the fixed effects on Application model,
which isn't surprising. The clear difference between the crossed and
random intercept model will be on the interval estimate, but that's
not available here because estat icc doesn't work.
--
JVVerkuilen, PhD
[email protected]
"It is like a finger pointing away to the moon. Do not concentrate on
the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory." --Bruce Lee,
Enter the Dragon (1973)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/