Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-
Date   Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:29:25 -0500

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
> No one seems interested in this suggestion.

To the contrary, I was thinking a lot about the problem but didn't
have anything coherent to say.


 But it is well to know
> what patterns do or do not exist before you start quantifying them.

It's essential!


> This is just to underline that repeating the graphs with ranks
> underlines how much information is thereby discarded and that while
> such graphs may not work well with many more raters and/or scores,
> they do work well here.

The trick with many more raters or scores isn't to abandon graphing,
but to choose a good projection to highlight features of interest.
Many areas, such as agreement modeling or reliability measurement, are
not viewed as model fitting or building enterprises. This needs to
change.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index