Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Jason R Franken <JR-Franken@wiu.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit |

Date |
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:47:41 -0600 (CST) |

Thanks John, By the way, when I tried -overid- after 3SLS, STATA returned the following error message "overid works only after ivreg, ivreg2; use overidxt after xtivreg" ... Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Antonakis" <John.Antonakis@unil.ch> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 11:22:41 AM Subject: Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit OK...that chi-square is just a Wald test that the predictors simultaneously = 0. It is not an overidentification statistic. You should run that statistic in any case if you are overidentified by using the userwritten command -overid- (available from SSC) to ensure that the model constraints are tenable. After running reg3 just type -overid-. Although a negative r-square is not necessarily a bad thing, it could indicate misspecification, and the overidentification stat will catch that. Best, J. P.S. it is always good and saves everyone time if you post your output so we are all on the same page. __________________________________________ John Antonakis Professor of Organizational Behavior Director, Ph.D. Program in Management Faculty of Business and Economics University of Lausanne Internef #618 CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny Switzerland Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438 Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305 http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis Associate Editor The Leadership Quarterly __________________________________________ On 10.02.2013 17:58, Jason R Franken wrote: > The chi-square statistic I'm talking about is posted to the right of R-square in 3SLS output from reg3 (or an F-statistic in the 2SLS version). I'm in doubt that it is the identification statistic described in the prior response to this post, since it is significant in text book examples with positive R-square at: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/examples/greene/greene16.htm. > > I thought this chi-square statistic is for the test of whether the model is no better better predictor of the dependent variable than its mean, but the negative R-squares I observe can occur when "ybar is a better predictor of y (in the sum-of-squares sense) than Xb" according to http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/two-stage-least-squares/. Hence, I shouldn't see a negative r-square when the chi-square test statistic rejects the null that ybar is as good as my model. > > I'm not sure what the chi-square statistic is testing ... > > Thanks again. > > Jason > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Antonakis" <John.Antonakis@unil.ch> > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 2:26:58 AM > Subject: Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit > > I would worry more about the chi-square statistic of fit (i.e., > overidentification statistic, which is what I assume you are talking > about). If that is significant, the model is misspecified and an > unlikely candidate to have generated the data. So, I would rethink the > model. > > Best, > J. > > __________________________________________ > > John Antonakis > Professor of Organizational Behavior > Director, Ph.D. Program in Management > > Faculty of Business and Economics > University of Lausanne > Internef #618 > CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny > Switzerland > Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438 > Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305 > http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis > > Associate Editor > The Leadership Quarterly > __________________________________________ > > On 10.02.2013 07:17, Jason R Franken wrote: >> I'm running 3SLS using reg3 and get negative R-square (consistent with the explanation at http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/two-stage-least-squares/). As I understand, this can happen when the mean of the dependent variable is a better predictor than the model. However, the p-values of the chi-square statistic are significant. What if anything can I determine about model fit from the R-square and chi-square statistics in the output of reg3? >> >> Thank you in advance for any insight you can provide. >> >> Jason Franken >> >> >> Jason Franken >> Assistant Professor >> School of Agriculture >> Western Illinois University >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit***From:*John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>

**References**:**Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit***From:*John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>

- Prev by Date:
**st: time series from panel data** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: STATA Pivot capability** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Q on reg3 output for model fit** - Index(es):