Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Bootstrapping question |

Date |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:20:53 +0000 |

We agree. I was referring to your bottom line in your previous post. On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, JVerkuilen (Gmail) <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: >> I agree, but note the bottom line, namely that Henry's problem is >> about an ordinal variable with several proportions. > > Yes, that's why I said that a multinomial analysis would be necessary, > but sometimes those end up becoming contrasts of binomials. > >> >> As a minute point, Jeffreys' procedure has a frequentist >> interpretation as a continuity-corrected version of the so-called >> exact (Clopper-Pearson) confidence interval. > > Yes, that's true, the same procedures can often be viewed from > different angles. I tend to think of Bayes methods as a convenient way > of imposing a roughness penalty on likelihoods. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Problem with standard errors using eststo***From:*Johan Hellström <johan.hellstrom@pol.umu.se>

**st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"Ilian, Henry (ACS)" <Henry.Ilian@dfa.state.ny.us>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"Ilian, Henry (ACS)" <Henry.Ilian@dfa.state.ny.us>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"Ilian, Henry (ACS)" <Henry.Ilian@dfa.state.ny.us>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"Ilian, Henry (ACS)" <Henry.Ilian@dfa.state.ny.us>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"Ilian, Henry (ACS)" <Henry.Ilian@dfa.state.ny.us>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Bootstrapping question***From:*"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: FW: forvalues question...** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: FW: forvalues question...** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Bootstrapping question** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Bootstrapping question** - Index(es):