Unfortunately Nick and John, I must use adj r-squared because it
represents a specific metric in the field of accounting. More
specifically, I use a model where returns are the dependent variable
and earnings, along with the change in earnings, are the independent
variables. In this model the adjusted r-squared represents the value
relevance of the earnings (this is what I am trying to gauge).
Therefore, I am obliged to use r2.
Thank you for the procedure you mention John, but I had already tried
it in the past. It is helpful, but only in a vague way. It does not
provide the mean and the variance of r2, so I could use them to test
the significance. For instance, the intervals almost always overlap
when I use this method. That does not provide concrete evidence of
statistical significance or non-significance. If I don't prove that
there is (or there is not) a statistically significant difference, I
cannot show whether my metric (value relevance) has been altered
between the two periods.
2013/2/6 John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>
Can't agree more with you Nick. We should care more about having
consistent estimators than high r-squares (i.e., Panagiotis, what I
mean here is that we can still estimate the slope consistently even if
we don't have a tight fitting regression line). So, I don't know why
you are interested in this comparison, Panagiotis. I would think you
would be more interested in comparing estimates, as in a Chow test
(Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in
two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591-605). If you are
using fixed-effects models, you can model the fixed-effects with
dummies and then do a Chow test via suest....see -help suest-.
Best,
J.
__________________________________________
John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management
Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 06.02.2013 11:40, Nick Cox wrote:
That's positive advice.
My own other idea is that adjusted R-squares are a lousy basis to
compare two models, even of the same kind. They leave out too much
information.
Nick
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, John Antonakis
<John.Antonakis@unil.ch> wrote: