Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Travis Smith <travisa.smith7@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list? |

Date |
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 14:50:01 -0600 |

Thanks. Both responses were very helpful. I am using LaTeX, so I will check out that package, Ryan. RE: William's advice, for some reason, it seems that using -{stSerif}- gives wonky typesetting and negates the subscript, whereas using "Times New Roman" worked much better (I'm on a Mac, if that matters). See below, webuse auto, clear graph set window fontface {stSerif} scatter price mpg, text(12000 20 "{it:F}{subscript:{it:A}}") graph set window fontface "Times New Roman" scatter price mpg, text(12000 20 "{it:F}{subscript:{it:A}}") On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:39 PM, William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net> wrote: > See -h graph set window fontface-. You can use this for a global font type setting and then not need to worry about setting the font face for individual words/phrases/options. However, if you are using multiple fonts in the same graph there isn't likely to be any simple modification beyond creating a scheme. > > HTH, > Billy > > > > On Feb 2, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Travis Smith wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have two questions about SMCL tags. >> >> 1. Is it possible to incorporate SMCL tags into a scheme? >> Specifically, I would like all my fonts to {stSerif:} without having >> to enter this into the graphics options for every word. Similar >> question asked here, but with no response: >> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-06/msg01237.html >> >> 2. Is this the most exhaustive list of SMCl tags? >> http://www.stata.com/bookstore/pdf/g_text.pdf >> More specifically, I would like to use a "preferred-to" symbol in a >> graphic (e.g., indifference curves) rather than a "greater-than" >> symbol. >> >> Thanks, >> Travis >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?***From:*William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net>

**References**:**st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?***From:*Travis Smith <travisa.smith7@gmail.com>

**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?***From:*William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: SMCL tags in schemes? Exhaustive tag list?** - Index(es):