Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance
Date   Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:24:50 -0500

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Mário Marques <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks you for your comments, I am going to explore a little more the
> option of re. There is no option on both xtpoisson and xtnbreg for
> robust standard erros :(,

I'm not sure why that would be the case but you're right.


I was wondering whether it was possible to
> obtain them "manually" (installing a routine or...), the referee's
> report of my paper asks for it... Let see what I can do.

I wonder if -suest- can be tricked into getting them for you?

Jay

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index