Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect |

Date |
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:23:51 -0500 |

I never understand the requests to get marginal effects of interaction terms. If you have x1, x2, and x1*x2, then x1*x2 can't change unless x1 and/or x2 changes. If you run a model with these terms in Stata using factor variable notation, you can get marginal effects for x1 and x2 but not for their interaction term. Which, to me, is the way things should be. Am I missing something? Sent from my iPad On Dec 24, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com> wrote: > Dependent variable is bounded between 0 and 1. I wanted to use -glm with -logit. But my concern is that in logit models we have some difficulties in order to get marginal effects of interaction terms. In fractional logit models do we have the same problem? or do we just need to add the interaction terms and interpret the results as they are in the outcome table? > > Kind regards > Ebru > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:59:43 -0500 >> Subject: Re: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect >> From: jvverkuilen@gmail.com >> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> How do we test interaction effect in fractional logit model? >> >> This question is not well-formed. It's very important to specify what >> procedure you are using and what you mean. If it's the -fraclogit- >> procedure that can be downloaded (-findit fraclogit-) the answer is >> that you specify the interactions in the usual way (i.e., with # and >> ## between terms you want to interact) and can get a Wald test via >> -testparm- in the usual way. -lrtest- does not appear to work directly >> because this is a quasi-likelihood model and the log-likelihood term >> is not saved. >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Fractional logit model interaction effect***From:*Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com>

**Re: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect***From:*"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect***From:*Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: recoding question** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Fractional logit model interaction effect** - Index(es):