Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Yeo-Johnson Power Transformation

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Re: st: Yeo-Johnson Power Transformation
Date   Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:38:47 +0000

Naturally the Gaussian is defined on the real line. But measurement
errors apart, most distributions that can be positive, zero, or
negative appear to be positive mostly and zero or negative
occasionally and thus positively skewed overall, so I was thinking of
skewed distributions.


On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Nick Cox <> wrote:

> 3. At best the distribution of the response is unimodal and
> well-behaved in which case modelling in its terms is likely to be more
> productive than thinking of a transformation parameter to be
> estimated. (Such distributions on the entire real line seem in short
> supply, but the Gumbel is one such.) If the parameter is a vector of
> parameters, the point gains strength.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index