Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test |

Date |
Thu, 6 Dec 2012 06:27:08 -0800 |

Of course they do. After all in panel framework you are following each subject across time. So any typical problems of cross-section and time-series are relevant for a panel. As an example consider the following interesting application, based on a study I have just completed. The government gave public-housing tenants the option to purchase their renal units after a major discount, which vary from one period to another. We had the trail of the discount for each and every tenant, but we had to check this trail is random walk (otherwise tenants will anticipate the momentum and wait until the last day to exercise). Under these circumstances we ran a panel unit-root test, and the unit root hypothesis was not rejected. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Francesoc Paldini <f.paldini@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Yuval, > > thank you very much. Unfortunately, I can not read your answer (the > technical part, which starts with: "In a nutshell, unit root is a very > big problem in time-series" is missing). > > I know the problem of "unit roots" in time series data. I'm wondering, > if those problems are existing in panel applications (fixed effects > estimator), too. > > Thanks again! > Frances > > > 2012/12/6 Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com>: >> There are several interesting applications to the unit-root hypothesis: >> >> According to the quantity theory of money M=kPY where M is the >> quantity of money, P is price level and Y is the GDP. The prominent >> prediction of the model is neutrality of money: if M increases by x% >> and Y is fixed P is expected to increase by x%. >> >> Note that if we convert this into a logarithmic form, it turns out >> that the model predicts a unit root as a coefficient of P and Y. In >> fact, somebody checked the theory based on the unit-root hypothesis. >> >> Another interesting application is based on a study I have just >> completed. The government gave public-housing tenants the option to >> purchase their renal units after a major discount, which vary from one >> period to another. We had the trail of the discount for each and every >> tenant, but we had to check this trail is random walk (otherwise >> tenants will anticipate the momentum and wait until the last day to >> exercise). Under these circumstances we ran a panel unit-root test, >> and the unit root hypothesis was not rejected. >> >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Frances, >>> >>> In a nutshell, unit root is a very big problem in time-series >>> analysis. If there is a unit root the series is a random walk and >>> explosive. This implies that the estimates are inefficient, and by >>> backward induction we can show that the SD estimates do not converge >>> anywhere. A simple way to explain it is to divide a series to >>> sub-samples. Imagine that the mean and SD of each sub-sample is >>> different. >>> >>> A simple way to address unit-root problems is to use a difference >>> series, i.e., Yt-Yt-1 >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Francesoc Paldini <f.paldini@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello Statalist, >>>> >>>> I'm working with dynamic panel data (unfortunately with small >>>> data sets) and I'm performing simple fixed effect estimations. Since T >>>> is pretty large (T=30), I don't care about the Nickel Bias. >>>> >>>> Actually, I don't get the concept of unit root tests for panel data? >>>> Under which circumstances are unit roots problematic? >>>> >>>> Does the asymptotic distribution theory require the estimator to >>>> satisfy the usual (time series) conditions that rule out unit and >>>> explosive roots? Do I need lots of cross-sectional units (in my case: >>>> N=20)? >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> Frances >>>> * >>>> * For searches and help try: >>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Yuval Arbel >>> School of Business >>> Carmel Academic Center >>> 4 Shaar Palmer Street, >>> Haifa 33031, Israel >>> e-mail1: yuval.arbel@carmel.ac.il >>> e-mail2: yuval.arbel@gmail.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Yuval Arbel >> School of Business >> Carmel Academic Center >> 4 Shaar Palmer Street, >> Haifa 33031, Israel >> e-mail1: yuval.arbel@carmel.ac.il >> e-mail2: yuval.arbel@gmail.com >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Dr. Yuval Arbel School of Business Carmel Academic Center 4 Shaar Palmer Street, Haifa 33031, Israel e-mail1: yuval.arbel@carmel.ac.il e-mail2: yuval.arbel@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test***From:*Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test***From:*Francesoc Paldini <f.paldini@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test***From:*Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test***From:*Francesoc Paldini <f.paldini@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Creating print-ready tables for one-sample t-tests** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Fwd: Panel Unit Root Test** - Index(es):