Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: can cond() be nested (within nl)?


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: can cond() be nested (within nl)?
Date   Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:39:05 +0000

It is perfectly legal to include -cond()- within the <sexp> in

nl (depvar=<sexp>) [if] [in] [weight] [, options]

if that is what you mean. But -mkspline- followed by -regress- sounds
much easier here.

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, David Raitzer <raitzer2002@yahoo.com> wrote:

I am trying to do a segmented linear regression with the nl function
and cond.  The intention is to have two breakpoints and 3 segments,
which means that 3 conditions are required.   Can cond be nested
within nl to apply more than 2 conditions?  If not, what is the best
way to approach such a regression when the segmentation depends upon 3
ranges of an x, rather than only 2? Thanks!
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index