Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Simon <scmoore.lists@googlemail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Number of people present by date and time |

Date |
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 10:02:52 +0000 |

Dear Nick and Rebecca,

Simon On 29/11/2012 19:04, Nick Cox wrote:

Should be easier than I implied. Even if a unique identifier doesn't exist for each observation, you just create one. For a _big_ dataset, be careful on variable type. I am assuming that -arrival- and -depart- are Stata date-times. gen long obsid = _n expand 2 bysort obsid : gen inout = cond(_n == 1, 1, -1) by obsid : gen double time = cond(_n == 1, arrival, depart) sort time gen present = sum(inout) Two simple checks on logic and data quality 1. The number in the clinic should never be negative. 2. The number in the clinic should be zero when the clinic is closed. Nick On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Nick Cox<njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:Each observation is, I gather, a patient. One technique is to make each observation an arrival or departure. For a very simple toy dataset with just times for one day: . l +-----------------------+ | arrival depart id | |-----------------------| 1. | 1000 1100 1 | 2. | 1030 1200 2 | 3. | 1230 1300 3 | +-----------------------+ . expand 2 (3 observations created) . bysort id : gen inout = cond(_n == 1, 1, -1) . by id : gen time = cond(_n == 1, arrival, depart) . sort time . l +--------------------------------------+ | arrival depart id inout time | |--------------------------------------| 1. | 1000 1100 1 1 1000 | 2. | 1030 1200 2 1 1030 | 3. | 1000 1100 1 -1 1100 | 4. | 1030 1200 2 -1 1200 | 5. | 1230 1300 3 1 1230 | |--------------------------------------| 6. | 1230 1300 3 -1 1300 | +--------------------------------------+ . gen present = sum(inout) . l, sep(0) +------------------------------------------------+ | arrival depart id inout time present | |------------------------------------------------| 1. | 1000 1100 1 1 1000 1 | 2. | 1030 1200 2 1 1030 2 | 3. | 1000 1100 1 -1 1100 1 | 4. | 1030 1200 2 -1 1200 0 | 5. | 1230 1300 3 1 1230 1 | 6. | 1230 1300 3 -1 1300 0 | +------------------------------------------------+ This is only one trick, and others will depend on your data. For example, if your clinic is only open daily, you may be able to, or need to, exploit that. If patients can come to a clinic more than once a day that will provide a complication. All told, you should not need loops here. The two keys are likely to be (1) the best data structure (2) heavy use of -by:-. Nick On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Simon<scmoore.lists@googlemail.com> wrote:This is quite possible a rather naive question, but for some reason I am stuck. I have data from a clinic. I have the time each patient checks in (arrdatetime), the time they leave (depdatetime) and the time taken to first consultation (waittime) in minutes. What I would like to do is compare the number of people in the clinic for each patient at arrdatetime with waittime. So far the best I can come up with is to write a loop, going through every patients' arrdatetime and counting up those whose arrival and departure times span this value. But I have rather a lot of data and this seems terribly inefficient.* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Stuck in a logistic regression. Roadmap** - Next by Date:
**st: storing part of variable names in a list** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Stuck in a logistic regression. Roadmap** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: storing part of variable names in a list** - Index(es):