Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
jpitblado@stata.com (Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP) |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: interaction notation for lincom (and test) |

Date |
Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:13:37 -0600 |

Ben Hoen <bhoen@lbl.gov> is using interaction terms that contain variables with long names, and would like to compute tests and linear combinations of their coefficients: > This is a bit of a shot in the dark... > > I have interacted variables in a regression that I want to compare using > lincom (or test) and wanted to know if there was a shorthand way to recall > the variables. The difficulty is that a number of the names of the > variables are quite long (and not something I can change), so having a > shorthand way to get at their coefficients and their se would be preferred. > > > For example, say I had this: > *================================================== > sysuse auto, clear > g long_name_a=round(runiform())+1 > g long_name_b=round(2*runiform())+1 > > areg price mpg i.long_name_a#ib3.long_name_b, abs(foreign) > > matrix list e(b) > > * I can access the stored results of the variables like this > lincom 1b.long_name_a#1.long_name_b-2.long_name_a#1.long_name_b > > *but I hoped that I could get at the same via some matrix notation from e(b) > > *==================================================== > > > Admittedly I am a novice in how to work with matrices but I thought I would > try the list. I built a working example based on Ben's example: . set seed 1234 . sysuse auto . gen long_name_a = ceil(2*runiform()) . gen long_name_b = ceil(3*runiform()) . areg price mpg i.l~e_a#ib3.l~e_b, abs(foreign) Side note -- notation shortcut: Notice that I used the tilde character '~' as a way to cut down on the number of characters I have to type while referencing variables with long names. Here '~' is the abbreviation character that tells Stata to look for the unique variable that fits the specified pattern. In Ben's example, the long variable names all have prefix 'long_name_', and since there are no other variables that also use a prefix like this, we can use 'l~e_' as our prefix. This is merely a shortcut in specifying the variables and does not answer Ben's original question. On to Ben's question. Ben would like to compute tests and linear combinations of the coefficients on the elements of interaction terms. The -lincom- example provided was: . lincom 1b.long_name_a#1.long_name_b-2.long_name_a#1.long_name_b Neither -test- nor -lincom- allows the '~' shortcut, so that is no help. Stata 12 has two new postestimation commands that were specifically developed to take advantage of factor variables notation to perform the kinds of computations that Ben is asking about. -pwcompare- performs pairwise comparisons across levels of factor variables in the current model. It will also report the marginal linear predictions for each cell of a specified factor variables term. -contrast- computes contrasts (and tests) across levels of factor variables in the current model, and has a more direct bearing on Ben's question. So using the above -lincom- as an example, the equivalent -constrast- command is: . contrast a.l~e_a@l~e_b The revelant output from our example follows after my signature. The -contrast- command extends the factor variables notation to include operators for several kinds of contrasts. The ones used here are 'a.', the adjacent contrast operator, which compares the current level with the next; and '@' which tells -contrast- to compute contrasts of the preceeding variable within levels of the following variable. Thus breaking the above syntax into its parts we have a.l~e_a -- compute adjacent contrasts of l~e_a @l~e_b -- compute the above contrasts within each level of l~e_b Since l~e_a has 2 levels and l~e_b has 3 levels, this will yield a contrast of 1.l~e_a versus 2.l~e_a for each of the 3 levels of l~e_b. These comparisons are between the marginal linear predictions within each cell defined by the interaction term l~e_a#l~e_b originally specified in the model. Ben can use the -cimeans- option of -pwcompare- with the interaction term of interest to see what the marginal linear predictions are. In our example, that would be . pwcompare l~e_b#l~e_a, cimargins --Jeff jpitblado@stata.com ***** BEGIN: . areg price mpg i.l~e_a#ib3.l~e_b, abs(for) Linear regression, absorbing indicators Number of obs = 74 F( 6, 66) = 4.84 Prob > F = 0.0004 R-squared = 0.3072 Adj R-squared = 0.2338 Root MSE = 2581.8232 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ price | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- mpg | -280.9069 59.85255 -4.69 0.000 -400.4063 -161.4074 | long_name_a#| long_name_b | 1 1 | -540.983 1057.622 -0.51 0.611 -2652.594 1570.628 1 2 | -405.8745 1010.844 -0.40 0.689 -2424.09 1612.341 2 1 | -286.6583 1199.695 -0.24 0.812 -2681.926 2108.61 2 2 | 658.2365 1111.33 0.59 0.556 -1560.606 2877.079 2 3 | 500.0031 1071.185 0.47 0.642 -1638.687 2638.693 | _cons | 12188.71 1436.19 8.49 0.000 9321.264 15056.15 -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- foreign | F(1, 66) = 6.310 0.014 (2 categories) . lincom 1b.long_name_a#1.long_name_b-2.long_name_a#1.long_name_b ( 1) 1b.long_name_a#1.long_name_b - 2.long_name_a#1.long_name_b = 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ price | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- (1) | -254.3247 1159.891 -0.22 0.827 -2570.121 2061.472 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . contrast a.l~e_a@l~e_b Contrasts of marginal linear predictions Margins : asbalanced ----------------------------------------------------------- | df F P>F ------------------------+---------------------------------- long_name_a@long_name_b | (1 vs 2) 1 | 1 0.05 0.8271 (1 vs 2) 2 | 1 1.13 0.2909 (1 vs 2) 3 | 1 0.22 0.6422 Joint | 3 0.47 0.7062 | Residual | 66 ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Contrast Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval] ------------------------+------------------------------------------------ long_name_a@long_name_b | (1 vs 2) 1 | -254.3247 1159.891 -2570.121 2061.472 (1 vs 2) 2 | -1064.111 999.4268 -3059.531 931.3089 (1 vs 2) 3 | -500.0031 1071.185 -2638.693 1638.687 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- . pwcompare l~e_b#l~e_a, cimargins Pairwise comparisons of marginal linear predictions Margins : asbalanced ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Unadjusted | Margin Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval] ------------------------+------------------------------------------------ long_name_b#long_name_a | 1 1 | 11647.73 1556.118 8540.836 14754.62 1 2 | 11902.05 1513.169 8880.911 14923.19 2 1 | 11782.83 1473.998 8839.903 14725.77 2 2 | 12846.95 1554.33 9743.626 15950.27 3 1 | 12188.71 1436.19 9321.264 15056.15 3 2 | 12688.71 1326.12 10041.03 15336.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ***** END: * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: interaction notation for lincom (and test)***From:*"Ben Hoen" <bhoen@lbl.gov>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Analyzing multiple mediators** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Analyzing multiple mediators** - Previous by thread:
**st: interaction notation for lincom (and test)** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: interaction notation for lincom (and test)** - Index(es):