Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: non-proportional odds and multilevel models


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: non-proportional odds and multilevel models
Date   Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:02:06 -0500

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:52 AM,  <Linda.Kampata@student.uib.no> wrote:

>
> What options do I have?

I guess it depends. I've often found that that test is rejected but
the nature of the rejection is fairly trivial. It might be a sign that
you have an omitted variable. You may want to lean on your model
specification some more. You could also need a different link such as
cloglog instead of logit. As another poster said, the gologit approach
could be used.

I think it's important to check whether the model is good before
switching to a different link function or non-proportional odds.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index