Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Ameya Bondre <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression |

Date |
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:20:54 -0800 |

You are right about the fourfold table.. I am thinking of an alternative way to use these indicators that I have below for the same case (the corresponding variables are binary in the data set with a binary "time" variable having two values - for 2009 and 2011): time period malnutrition breastfeeding growth monitoring hand washing 2009 38% 27% 46% 40% 2011 34% 40% 50% 48% Is there a method that can test the association between change (absolute or percentage change) in a response variable (malnutrition) and changes in the above predictors, between these two time points (when data collected at both times is cross-sectional and independent)? The aim here is to evaluate the sustainability of a program that ended in 2009, by comparing the situation in 2009 with 2011. These efforts/behaviors (predictors) were intensely promoted during the program from 2005 till 2009, to prevent malnutrition from rising. Sorry, I hope this works... the link for the counter-factual logic is useful but I think it doesn't fit with the study aim. On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > > This model ignores cases of absent or present in both years and > changes in the other direction. It doesn't seem interesting or useful > to me, as you are throwing away three cells of a fourfold table. But I > am not an epidemiologist and may well be misunderstanding your aim. > > Nick > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Ameya Bondre > <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am sorry but I think I was not clear... > > > > So, the logit model that I am looking for is - > > > > malnutrition (0 = present in 2009 and 1 = present in 2011) ---> > > constant + exclusive breastfeeding (0 = present in 2009 and 1 = > > present in 2011) > > > > to see relationship between change in malnutrition as a function of > > time and a function of change in breastfeeding prevalence... > > > > > > and the data I have is - > > > > mal bf time > > 1 0 0 0 > > 2 1 0 0 > > 3 1 1 0 > > 4 0 1 1 > > 5 0 1 1 > > 6 1 0 1 > > > > where 0 and 1 for mal and bf, stand for "no" and "yes" or "absence" > > and "presence" of malnutrition and breastfeeding respectively, > > depending on time = 0 (2009) or 1 (2011). Both variables could take > > either of 2 possible values at one time. > > > > So, I can surely do logits choosing one of these variables as a > > function of time like; mal = c + time /bf = c + time.. > > > > but, if I perform a logit like this: mal = c + bf + time, it can't > > give the relationship between change in mal (y) and change in bf (x), > > over time (or from 2009 to 2011)?... > > > > I am sorry, I hope I'm clear now?.. > > > > Thank you for your time.. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'd follow Maarten's pointers on this. Yes; -bf- can be a predictor too. > >> > >> I am puzzled by your belief, repeated here, that you need new > >> variables. You already have the data in optimal form as 0 and 1 values > >> for logit analyses: creating different versions of the same variables > >> will make nothing easier and -logit- impossible. > >> > >> Nick > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Ameya Bondre > >> <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Thanks, I am trying to see if I can adapt the example given by > >> > Maarten, to my data...but would it be possible if I want to include > >> > mal and bf as a response and predictor respectively, in the same logit > >> > model and with this data set? > >> > > >> > If yes, do I have to create new variables from mal and bf, to see > >> > trend in mal as a function of trend in bf? > >> > > >> > I mean variables such as mal = 1 (mal in 2009) or 2 (mal in 2011) and > >> > bf = 1 (bf in 2009) or 2 (bf in 2011) > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> All your variables are binary, so your ordinal logit collapses to a > >> >> logit. Other predictors you don't name won't change that so long as > >> >> your outcome variable is fraction or proportion malnourished. > >> >> > >> >> Nick > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Ameya Bondre > >> >> <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > My data set is in this format: [observations 1 to 6 --> children > >> >> > (with > >> >> > their mothers as respondents)] > >> >> > > >> >> > mal bf time > >> >> > 1 0 0 0 > >> >> > 2 1 0 0 > >> >> > 3 1 1 0 > >> >> > 4 0 1 1 > >> >> > 5 0 1 1 > >> >> > 6 1 0 1 > >> >> > > >> >> > where each of the three variables is ordinal taking two values, 0 and > >> >> > 1. > >> >> > > >> >> > Explanation for variables: > >> >> > > >> >> > time: data collected in year ___ (0 = year 2009, 1 = year 2011) > >> >> > mal: child malnourished (0 = no, 1 = yes) > >> >> > bf: child breastfed exclusively for first six months (0 = no, 1 = > >> >> > yes) > >> >> > > >> >> > I want to see the relationship between the change in number of > >> >> > malnourished children with the change in number of children > >> >> > exclusively breastfed, from 2009 to 2011. I tried to perform an > >> >> > ordinal logistic regression but I am getting errors. > >> >> > > >> >> > Could you please explain the way in which I can construct new > >> >> > variables out of these, to enter in the ologit model? My end goal is > >> >> > to assess the change in malnutrition as a function of the change in > >> >> > other predictors as well, in addition to bf. > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Dr. Ameya Bondre Research Analyst, Tufts University, Boston, MA Master of Science in Public Health (MSPH) Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD MBBS, G.S Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India Phone: (781) 298-1668 Email: ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Ameya Bondre <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Ameya Bondre <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Ameya Bondre <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Ameya Bondre <ameyabondre.jhsph@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**re: Re: st: Question on estimation procedure** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Comparing trend (y) with trend (x) using ordinal logistic regression** - Index(es):