Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: data precision and problems therein
From
Pham Ngoc Minh <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: data precision and problems therein
Date
Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:15:31 +0900
Dear Maarten,
I grouped a continuous variable to define a disease, but not for
adjustment in the model. For example, diabetes is defined as HbA1c
>=6.5%. I did not quite understand your statement.
Minh
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Maarten Buis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Pham Ngoc Minh wrote:
>> I got the solution after reading Gould's instructions . I meant to
>> create categorical but not indicator variables, actually.
>
> There is no difference: they are equally bad.
>
> -- Maarten
>
> ---------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> WZB
> Reichpietschufer 50
> 10785 Berlin
> Germany
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> ---------------------------------
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/