Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators? |

Date |
Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:45:15 +0000 |

The short answer is that your "scalar calculation" is no such thing. You are asking to . di t -- thinking that scalar t will be displayed -- but Stata has three rules that together cause this to do something different. First off, variables and scalars share the same namespace. Second, if there's ambiguity Stata plumps for the variable name interpretation. Third, if asked to display a variable, -display- tries its best and its best is varname[1], here t[1], here 1. See also SJ-6-2 dm0021 . Stata tip 31: Scalar or variable? Problem of ambiguous names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. I. Kolev Q2/06 SJ 6(2):279--280 (no commands) tips for avoiding abbreviation conflicts with variables when naming scalars You're in very good company in being puzzled by this, as only a concatenation of circumstances explains it all. Nick On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Aaron Kirkman <ak1795mailserv@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm performing a simple linear regression on time series data and > calculating the t-statistic for coefficients afterwards. However, I > noticed that when using time series operators, the t-statistic always > calculates to be one, even though the values from the regression are > correct. For example, this code: > > ---------- > clear all > > set seed Xc0114d4971eea6310add269363d61a6d00042c5f > local y0 0 > set obs 200 > quietly { > gen y = . > gen t = _n > tsset t > > replace y = cond(t == 1, `y0', L.y + rnormal()) > regress D.y L.y > } > > di _b[L.y] > di _se[L.y] > di _b[L.y] / _se[L.y] > > scalar t = _b[L.y] / _se[L.y] // t = Beta / SE > > di t > ---------- > > outputs the following: > > -.02092465 // _b[L.y] > .01391362 // _se[L.y] > -1.5038971 // _b[L.y] / _se[L.y] > 1 // scalar "t" > > The first three numbers are the correct values from the regression, > but the calculation for the t-statistic is incorrect. If I remove the > time series operators from the code and instead refer to observations > numbers (I would prefer to use time series operators, but just as an > example), the resulting t-statistic is correct: > > ---------- > clear all > set seed Xc0114d4971eea6310add269363d61a6d00042c5f > local y0 0 > set obs 200 > quietly { > gen y = . > gen ly = . > gen dy = . > > replace y = cond(_n == 1, `y0', y[_n - 1] + rnormal()) > replace ly = y[_n - 1] > replace dy = y - ly > > regress dy ly > } > > di _b[ly] > di _se[ly] > di _b[ly] / _se[ly] > > scalar t = _b[ly] / _se[ly] // t = Beta / SE > di t > ---------- > > This code outputs the correct t-statistic of -1.5038971 > > -.02092465 // _b[L.y] > .01391362 // _se[L.y] > -1.5038971 // _b[L.y] / _se[L.y] > -1.5038971 // scalar "t" > > > I read through "[U] 13.5 Accessing coefficients and standard errors" > and --help scalar--, but I don't see anything in either of those > manuals that would cause the problem. Any ideas? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?***From:*Aaron Kirkman <ak1795mailserv@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Why does this scalar calculation return the wrong value when using time series operators?** - Index(es):