Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Poisson and Negbin models |

Date |
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:17:08 +0100 |

> The first indication is it that Y is overdispersed as the mean and the variance is not equal, nor close being equal (mean 4.347222 < var 542.6806). A formal Goodness-of-fit test of Y alone, using estat gof- after -poisson $y-, indicates Y is significantly different from a Poisson distribution (chi2 = 1726.882, Prob > chi2(71) = 0.0000). Similarly the LR test of alpha related to the output from -nbreg $y- indicates that the negbin model is preferred over the Poisson (LR=0: chibar2(01) = 1570.16 Prob>=chibar2 = 0.000). Those are not appropriate tests as you would not expect the marginal distribution of y to Poisson or negative binomially distribution, otherwise you would not have added the explanatory variables later on... See e.g. <http://www.maartenbuis.nl/presentations/berlin12.html> > When I run the model Y=X1 X2…Xn, using the -nbreg- command, I end up with some problems. The model outcome indicates some problem with the alpha, and a LR test indicating that the Poission is preferred over the negbin model: <snip> > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > /lnalpha | -18.90698 558.4214 113.393 1075.579 > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > alpha | 6.15e-09 3.43e-06 0 . > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > I would appreciate if someone could explain what seems to be the problem(s) here, and some indication on the problem related to the alpha in the negbin model. A Poisson model is a negative binomial model with an alpha of 0. In your case the alpha is 0.000000000615 (if I counted the 0s correctly). So to all intends and purposes you estimated a Poisson model with -nbreg-. -- Maarten --------------------------------- Maarten L. Buis WZB Reichpietschufer 50 10785 Berlin Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl --------------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Poisson and Negbin models***From:*Simon Falck <simon.falck@abe.kth.se>

**References**:**st: Poisson and Negbin models***From:*Simon Falck <simon.falck@abe.kth.se>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Endless iteration because of too many cases?** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: Queries about -cond()** - Previous by thread:
**st: Poisson and Negbin models** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Poisson and Negbin models** - Index(es):