Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st:"endoegnous binary regressor"


From   Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st:"endoegnous binary regressor"
Date   Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:05:14 -0400

Ayman Farahat <ayman.farahat@yahoo.com>:
-biprobit- and -cmp- (SSC) are one way forward, since -ivprobit- and
-treatreg- are clearly not applicable. See also
http://www.stata.com/meeting/chicago11/materials/chi11_nichols.pdf

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ayman Farahat <ayman.farahat@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am working with a model for predicting business failure. The outcome is Binary.
> One of my regressors is whether the business offers a discount. This variable is also binary. However I suspect that this variable is endogenous.
>
> I have been looking
> IVPROBIT
> Biprobit
>  treatreg
>
> IVprobit and treatreg assume a continuous dependent variable.
> My question is which of these 3 models is best suited to my application, or whether there is another approach?
> Thanks
> Ayman
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index