Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: "xtdpdsys" command and "collapse" option


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: "xtdpdsys" command and "collapse" option
Date   Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:02:39 +0200

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:48 PM,  <ma9545@bdvb.de> wrote:
> I know the xtabond2 command, however, xtabond2 gives you huge
> possibilities for estimation. My problem with xtabond2 is that you have a
> lot of freedom to change the results by taking different options. I feel
> like manipulating the results by using xtabond2. Therefore, I decided to
> use the xtdpdsys command, which is quite simple and easy reproducible.

I don't understand that argument; How is arbitrarily choosing
-xtdpdsys- over -xtabond2- any less manipulative than choosing
particular options of -xtabond2-. The fact that you artificially
reduced the set of choices by ignoring the existence of -xtabond2- did
not make those choices go away. Seems to me you'll just have to learn
what all these models do and make an informed decision about which
model to use.

-- Maarten

---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index