Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: How to deal with the quasi-complete separation problem in the logit part of ZINB analysis


From   "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: How to deal with the quasi-complete separation problem in the logit part of ZINB analysis
Date   Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:07:43 -0400

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is a Jeffreys prior, or a Jeffreys' prior, as it was the idea of
> Sir Harold Jeffreys.
>
> In a letter to me in 1976 he wrote that he preferred the form
> Jeffreys's, but this is rarely seen.

Yeah I always misspell that! Jeffreys is a last name:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_jeffreys

Anyway, Firth's paper is a very nice idea and quite clearly written.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index