Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Joerg Luedicke <joerg.luedicke@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization |

Date |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:59:52 -0500 |

If there are 8 neighborhoods in 1 city then the level-3 sample size would be 1! As a result you would throw a bunch of constants in your model which does not make sense. Besides, a level-2 sample size of 8 is very small (at least for the standard likelihood based methods) and is usually problematic with respect to point and variance estimates of the fixed effects as well as the varying intercept/coefficient variation. I believe this is discussed in any multilevel textbook. Joerg On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, JVerkuilen (Gmail) <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Erik Alda <erik.alda@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Statalisters >> >> I am running a, so far, 2 level model on crime victimization using a survey >> of 8 neighborhoods in a large city in Brazil. The firs level is individual >> level predictors and the second level is neighborhood level predictors. >> Since the survey is not representative of the whole municipality, would I be >> able to include a 3rd level with citywide variables to estimate the effect >> of policy? > > I don't see why you can't include it though your level 3 N is somewhat > small. As long as the sample sizes per neighborhood aren't reasonably > even it should run OK, though. The fact that the survey isn't > representative is a study limitation and affects what conclusions you > can draw from it, but that's separate from whether there's level 3 > heterogeneity in the sample you do have. In some cases having the > external generalizability of a a representative sample is mandatory. > In other case it's not. > > > -- > JVVerkuilen, PhD > jvverkuilen@gmail.com > > "Out beyond ideas of wrong-doing and right-doing there is a field. > I'll meet you there. When the soul lies down in that grass the world > is too full to talk about." ---Rumi > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization***From:*"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: 3-level model for crime victimization***From:*Erik Alda <erik.alda@gmail.com>

**Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization***From:*"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization** - Next by Date:
**st: From: Rodrigo Briceño <rjbriceno@gmail.com>** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: 3-level model for crime victimization** - Index(es):