Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: ivpois with a binary endogenous predictor

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: ivpois with a binary endogenous predictor
Date   Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:00:54 -0400

Dimitriy V. Masterov <>:
No need to do anything different, though you can potentially improve
efficiency by running a logit of x on z first, predict p, then use p
as your excluded instrument. Instead of -ivpois-, you may prefer
-gmm-, assuming you are using Stata >10.
See also e.g.
on comparing your -gmm- estimates to others.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Dimitriy V. Masterov
<> wrote:
> I would like to estimate the effect of an endogenous binary variable
> (x) on expenditure and/or transactions (y), which have a fair amount
> of zeros (~12%) and a long right tail. I have a continuous instrument
> (z). I was hoping to use the  Austin Nichols' -ivpois- command to do
> this.
> Are there any econometric issues with the first stage being very
> different beast from the outcome equation?
> How does this issue interact with doing the diagnostics by hand, like
> the Hausman endogeniety test using the residuals?
> Are there better ways to tackle this problem?
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index