Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: bootstrapping with senspec |

Date |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:38:26 +0100 |

Roger Newson, the author of -senspec-, is a member of this list and no doubt will comment. But this looks wrong to me. In essence, -senspec- generates lots of variables. But you are trying to force them into scalars. In practice what that will mean is that the first value of each variable, and only the first value, will be carried over. I think you need another approach. In future postings, please note details that the FAQ explains: 1. No; you should not attach the dataset. Attachments should not be sent to Statalist. 2. For "STATA" read "Stata" throughout. Nick On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Bains, Lauren <Lauren.Bains@insel.ch> wrote: > I am trying to use bootstrapping in STATA 12.1 to calculate 95% confidence intervals of "sensitivity", "specificity", and "accuracy" on a clustered dataset of diagnosing positive and negative lymph node metastases clustered by pelvic side (right and left pelvic sides). I am new to programming with STATA, and am having some problems with the CIs, which I assume are likely related to my initial programming attempts. > > I am using the module senspec to return the true positives (TP), false negatives (FN), TN, FP, calculate accuracy, and return the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, which I downloaded from: > > http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s439801.html > > My bootstrapping program looks like this (apologies for what is likely an inelegant attempt): > > capture program drop bootstrap_sens_spec_da > program define sens_spec_da, rclass > tempvar s_calc_sens s_calc_spec fp1 fn1 tp1 tn1 > senspec `1' `2', sensitivity(`s_calc_sens') specificity(`s_calc_spec') nfpos(`fp1') nfneg(`fn1') ntpos(`tp1') ntneg(`tn1') > return scalar calc_da = (`tp1'+`tn1')/(`tp1'+`tn1'+`fp1'+`fn1') > return scalar calc_sens =`s_calc_sens' > return scalar calc_spec =`s_calc_spec' > end > > Then, I am using bootstrapping to calculate the confidence intervals: > > bootstrap r(calc_sens) r(calc_spec) r(calc_da), reps(1000) cluster(side): sens_spec_da histo_LN_ bin_R3_LN_ > estat bootstrap, all > > Some of the time this seems to work although the CIs seem large, compared with the results that one gets for sensitivity and specificity when not accounting for clustering using, for example, diagt. Sometimes it does not work at all. Using diagt to find the sensitivity and specificity for the 3rd reader works fine, but the bootstrapping fails. Here is the output of diagt: > > . diagt histo_LN_ bin_R3_LN_ > > | bin_R3_LN_ > histo_LN_ | Pos. Neg. | Total > -----------+----------------------+---------- > Abnormal | 25 19 | 44 > Normal | 25 171 | 196 > -----------+----------------------+---------- > Total | 50 190 | 240 > > True abnormal diagnosis defined as histo_LN_ = 1 > > > [95% Confidence Interval] > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Prevalence Pr(A) 18.3% 13.6% 23.8% > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sensitivity Pr(+|A) 56.8% 41.0% 71.7% > Specificity Pr(-|N) 87.2% 81.7% 91.6% > > > > And here is STATA's output of bootstrapping on the readings for R3 (the third reader): > > . bootstrap r(calc_sens) r(calc_spec) r(calc_da), reps(1000) cluster(side): sens_spec_da histo_LN_ bin_R3_LN_ > .... > > Bootstrap results Number of obs = 240 > Replications = 1000 > > command: sens_spec_da histo_LN_ bin_R3_LN_ > _bs_1: r(calc_sens) > _bs_2: r(calc_spec) > _bs_3: r(calc_da) > > (Replications based on 2 clusters in side) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | Observed Bootstrap Normal-based > | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > _bs_1 | 1 . . . . . > _bs_2 | 0 (omitted) > _bs_3 | .1833333 .0235188 7.80 0.000 .1372373 .2294294 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > (notice that the first two results, for sensitivity and specificity, fail to match with diagt) > > This is my first time posting to the STATA listserv, so I give my apologies in advance if I have provided too much (or not enough) detail. I can attach the dataset if that would be helpful. Any suggestions would be much appreciated! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: bootstrapping with senspec***From:*"Roger B. Newson" <r.newson@imperial.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: bootstrapping with senspec***From:*"Bains, Lauren" <Lauren.Bains@insel.ch>

- Prev by Date:
**st: bootstrapping with senspec** - Next by Date:
**st: onespell** - Previous by thread:
**st: bootstrapping with senspec** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: bootstrapping with senspec** - Index(es):