Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Seed, Paul" <paul.seed@kcl.ac.uk> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Mean test in a Likert Scale |

Date |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:01:19 +0100 |

Dear Statalist, I sympathise with everything Nick has said. But there is a further point to be considered here: It is sometimes argued on psychometric grounds that when people answer a question on a Likert scale, there are two processes - firstly the answer (Yes/No) secondly a personal preference (or avoidance) of extreme views (what is sometimes called "response style"). So mild-mannered Clark Kent may always give answers as 2 or 4, while Superman, the man of steel prefers 1 or 5. But their meaning is the same. (Or compare mild-mannered Chinese students with more forthright Americans). If so, and assuming you want to catch the answer & drop the personal preference; it makes sense to collapse the Likert scale to 2 or 3 points (possibly treating 3 as separate from 4 and 5). But that depends on the question "Do people really behave like this?" Googling "collapse Likert scale response style" turned up some relevant references, which I have not read. Leonor Saravia <lmisaravia@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Nick and David, I really appreciate your reply, thank you. I read carefully your answers to my questions and as Nick says, my first question pointed to the fact that there could be the sense in which computing the mean score of a Likert scale is allowed. I have seen practical studies were the mean of this kind of scales are calculated and interpreted. However, there is also literature that indicates that, as the Likert scales are an ordinal-level measure, you should not calculate the mean of it. So, I am confused because I do not understand whether calculating and interpreting the mean of a Likert scale is correct or not. The data I have is disaggregated by individual (20000 observations) of a treatment and a control group, and has the answer for each of the 26 questions, a number between 1 and 5, which are the values of a 5 point Likert scale from Disagree (1) to Agree (5). For instance, the first question (Q1) is: "Chilean people find entrepreneurial activities socially valuable" and the possible answers are: 1 - Strongly disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Nor agree nor disagree 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly agree So, the database has this structure: Observation Group Q1 Q2 ..... Q25 Q26 1 Treatment 1 5 ...... 3 1 2 Control 3 1 ....... 2 5 . . 19999 Control 5 2 ........ 4 3 20000 Treatment 3 2 ......... 5 4

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: Mean test in a Likert Scale***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: stepwise - how to get list of names of variables selected?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: stepwise - how to get list of names of variables selected?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Mean test in a Likert Scale** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Mean test in a Likert Scale** - Index(es):