Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Bonferroni-holm

From   "Lachenbruch, Peter" <>
To   "" <>
Subject   Re: st: Bonferroni-holm
Date   Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:07:58 -0700

Read the literature on multiple comparisons!  Books have been available for over 20 years

Sent from my iPhone
Tony Lachenbruch

On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:39 AM, "Sadjad Riahi" <> wrote:

> dear statalist,
> I have found In a paper with the similar methodology with ours that
> for correction of multiple comparisons, authors have applied
> bonferroni-holm correction. To explain the analysis in short, they
> have several dependent variable (subcorticalgray matter  region
> volumes) and three groups of diagnosis, intracranial volumes,age and
> sex as predictor variables.they have fitted a GLM for each region
> volume as the dependant variable seperately, then F test was preformed
> and subsequently contrast analysis. but for multiple comparison they
> first corrected for the omnibus test and then correction for pairwise
> comparison for each GLM that survived the first round of correction
> was performed. Can you please enlighten me with this correction
> procedure more in detail.
> yours,
> Sadjjad Riahi
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index