Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Problems with producing an acceptable Forest plot


From   "Roger B. Newson" <r.newson@imperial.ac.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Problems with producing an acceptable Forest plot
Date   Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:46:40 +0100

You don't say what version of -meta- you are using, or what version of Stata you are using. However, I suspect that you are using an out-of-date meta-analysis program, especially if its name is -meta- and not -metan-, and if your Stata version is recent enough to have a graphics editor. You should probably download an up-to-date version of -metan-, which (as I understand it) can be found by typing, in Stata,

net sj 9-2 sbe24_3

and installing the required packages.

A possible alternative might be to download the -parmest-, -parmhet- and -eclplot- packages from SSC, and to use the -metaparm- module of -parmest-, together with -parmhet- and -eclplot-, to do a customized meta-analysis. However, -metan- usually gives a more instant solution for most of the users, most of the time.

I hope this helps.

Best wishes

Roger


Roger B Newson BSc MSc DPhil
Lecturer in Medical Statistics
Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group
National Heart and Lung Institute
Imperial College London
Royal Brompton Campus
Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building
1B Manresa Road
London SW3 6LR
UNITED KINGDOM
Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381
Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322
Email: r.newson@imperial.ac.uk
Web page: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/
Departmental Web page:
http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/

Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution.

On 03/08/2012 14:20, ThomasStata wrote:
Hey there,

I'm urgently in need of help. After days of search and talkms with so called
experts I'm still as smart as before.:-(

I'm doing a meta-analysis with the meta-command like this:

"meta  var1  se_var1, graph (r) id(region) cline xline (0.06,0.075) fmult(3)
b2title (Prevalences) xlab (0.050, 0.055, 0.060,
0.066,0.07,0.075,0.08,0.085,0.09,0.095)"

But the produced forest plot is not acceptable. The graph editor does not
work for this kind of plot. And nobody knew why this is like this. Can you
help me with that?

And the biggrest problem for me is now that the regions are anumber of about
100. That means, that 100 regions on the x-axis is completely impossible to
show my professors, it does not fit on one A4-page, so besides some graphic
optimizations I of course need to cut the plot, make two or more parts of
it. Can anyone please help me?

Thank you very much in advance.

Thomas



--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/Problems-with-producing-an-acceptable-Forest-plot-tp7580229.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index