Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Using mi estimate with xtmixed and accounting for sampling weights


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Using mi estimate with xtmixed and accounting for sampling weights
Date   Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:04:58 +0200

Stata often protects you by disallowing combinations of options that
lead to invalid inference. Stas gave a reference showing that what you
wanted would lead to invalid inference, so that may well be what is
going on here.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Justina Kamiel Grayman wrote:
> It seems as though it should be possible to use weights in xtmixed AND
> use the "mi estimate" command.

> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Stas Kolenikov wrote:
>> To do this statistically properly, you need to follow Shao & Sitter
>> (1996; http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/article/1269394). Namely:

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany


http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index