Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Thread-index: AQHNYzVuthYG3q8N8Ee+qo7+M5pSrg==


From   "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Thread-index: AQHNYzVuthYG3q8N8Ee+qo7+M5pSrg==
Date   Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:37:06 -0700

THis is an uninformative title.  CAn you give a better one?  See FAQ

________________________________________
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Brendan Churchill [Brendan.Churchill@utas.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:28 AM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: Thread-index: AQHNYzVuthYG3q8N8Ee+qo7+M5pSrg==

Hi All

What is the best way to graph results from a multilevel model in Stata? I’ve tried the *predict* command but because I am using binaries and centred variables when I try to produce a graph – it looks a total mess. I have tried graphing by generating a variable made up of the coefficients, which yields better results (or rather better looking results) but when I add in binary variable coefficients or categorical coefficients again I have similar issues.

Any advice? Or do you need more information?

Greatly appreciated!

Brendan
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index