Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Age-specific reference intervals (xrigls) - no equation for SD? |

Date |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:59:25 +0100 |

-xrigls- is a user-written command, as you are asked to explain. It was originally published in 1997 in the STB and is maintained by Patrick Royston, who is not a member of Statalist. My guess from the lack of response to the question is that you are best advised to email Patrick directly for support. Nick On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Sofia Ramiro <sofiaramiro@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I sent this question some days ago but did not get any answer, so I send it again. Please let me know if the problem is my question not being clear enough or missing some information. >> > I am trying to define age-specific reference intervals with the command xrigls. > >> > >> > However, when running it, for some of the variables for which I want to define the age intervals I get an equation for the mean (with the corresponding power), but no equation for the SD - example below. I don't understand why. Can any of you explain this? >> > Are the values derived without the SD equation also right? >> > I don't understand why in the 1st table (FP powers) the change appears always as 0. I inspected the data and there is variation in this variable and throughout the different ages. >> > >> > >> > . xrigls schober15 age if sample==1, fp(m:df 4,s:df 2) centile(2.5 10 25 75 90 97.5) detail >> > >> > --- FP Powers --- >> > Cycle Mean SD Deviance Change Residual SS >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > 0 1 1217.262 0.000 509.4298 >> > 1 1 1217.262 0.000 509.4298 >> > 2 1 1217.262 0.000 509.4298 >> > >> > Final deviance = 1217.262 (393 observations). >> > Power(s) for mean curve = 1. >> > >> > Regression for mean curve >> > ------------------------- >> > (sum of wgt is 3.4287e+02) >> > >> > Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 393 >> > -------------+------------------------------ F( 1, 391) = 24.05 >> > Model | 31.3308787 1 31.3308787 Prob > F = 0.0000 >> > Residual | 509.429806 391 1.30288953 R-squared = 0.0579 >> > -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.0555 >> > Total | 540.760685 392 1.37949154 Root MSE = 1.1414 >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > schober15 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] >> > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- >> > age | -.0203814 .0041562 -4.90 0.000 -.0285528 -.01221 >> > _cons | 7.191451 .1913316 37.59 0.000 6.815284 7.567619 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Age-specific reference intervals (xrigls) - no equation for SD?***From:*Sofia Ramiro <sofiaramiro@hotmail.com>

**st: Age-specific reference intervals (xrigls) - no equation for SD?***From:*Sofia Ramiro <sofiaramiro@hotmail.com>

**RE: st: Age-specific reference intervals (xrigls) - no equation for SD?***From:*Sofia Ramiro <sofiaramiro@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Questions about xtsur, heteroskedasticity, and auto-correlation** - Next by Date:
**st: data manipulation prob.** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Age-specific reference intervals (xrigls) - no equation for SD?** - Next by thread:
**st: Gllapred Issues** - Index(es):