Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: instrumenting Moving average variable
From
Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: instrumenting Moving average variable
Date
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:53:30 -0400
Are you trying to estimate a dynamic panel data model? If not, why is
l.y endogenous?
_______________________
Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Søren Møller-Larsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear statalisters
>
> I have an dependent variable y, the l.y serves as an explanatory variable and will be instrumented with l2.y. Furthermore I have and a set of exogenous variables x.
> I use annual data.
> One of the seemingly exogenous variables are used in 3-year Moving averages resulting in overlapping periods. Therefore I reckon it cannot be interpreted as exogenous anymore and I consider instrumenting it with its third lag or alternatively a lagged excluded instrument.
>
> I want to perform the various first-stage tests of either ivreg2 or xtivreg2 to check the instrument validity. How should the 3-year MA variable be treated in a regression like the one below?
>
> ivreg2 y x (l.y = l2.y), first ffirst robust gmm2s
>
> Any help is appreciated. thanks
>
> Regards Soren
> Aarhus university
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/