Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Spooky: Different Results with Repeated FE Estimation


From   "Jacobs, David" <jacobs.184@sociology.osu.edu>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Spooky: Different Results with Repeated FE Estimation
Date   Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:43:59 +0000

How exactly did you lag?  If you use the Stata -L.- convention, Stata won't construct lags by using data from a prior case.

D.J.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Miyu Lee
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:41 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: Spooky: Different Results with Repeated FE Estimation

I (only) calculate averages, sum up variables and multiply.

Not sure if the log operation is the problem because the variables which I want to log do not contain negative values and I add 1 to each value before I log them.

Some of the variables I add or multiply are lagged, but do not think this could cause the different results..
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index