Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: xtmixed command


From   John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: xtmixed command
Date   Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:16:27 +0200

The best explanation to what, specifically, a random (vs fixed) effects model does is here:

Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A General Panel Model with Random and Fixed Effects: A Structural Equations Approach. Social Forces, 89(1), 1-34.

HTH,
J.

__________________________________________

Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________


On 19.04.2012 23:55, D. Demetriou wrote:
Thank you for your comments!

This is how i think of it: Fixed-effects are equivalent to n entity-specific dummies, in effect allowing for varying intercepts across regions.

A mixed effect (random intercept) model allows for the region-specific intercepts to vary from one wave/panel to the other (instead of assuming that entity-specific intercepts are constant over time).

Is this the correct intuition?? I hope it is!

Truly yours,

DD
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index