Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtmixed command
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtmixed command
Date
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:48:59 +0200
Right....but with the assumption that uij (the idiosyncratic term) is
orthogonal to uj (all unobserved heterogeneity due to the fixed
effects), which is an assumption that should be tested with a Hausman test.
Best,
J.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 19.04.2012 23:44, David Greenberg wrote:
The randomness in the intercept represents unobserved heterogeneity. '
David Greenberg, Sociology Department, NYU
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:37 PM, D. Demetriou<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
A quick question: does xtmixed (random intercept only) account for
unobserved heterogeneity of any type??
Thank you all in advance!
Yours,
DD
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/