Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
László Sándor <sandorl@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway- |

Date |
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:51:51 -0400 |

Oh, thanks, Eric! Shame I missed this in -limits-. That said, now I only wonder if these limits changed from Stata 11. In that environment I think we still could use a hack (mentioned in earlier postings), with more unique values than this. But I am just rambling here uselessly, I'll check it myself instead. Thanks again, Laszlo On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Eric Booth <eric.a.booth@gmail.com> wrote: > <> > > When you introduce the summarize() option to include the mean, SD, and Freq in the -tabulate- table cells, you hit a similar issue with Stata limits as if you tried to -tabulate- 2 categorical variables with too many categories (see -help limits- for -tabulate- and -tabulate, summarize- to those limitations). > > 2 solutions you might consider: (1) subset the data you run in a single -tabulate, summarize- or (2) create your table using other commands (like -collapse- and -reshape- below). > > > ******************! > clear > set obs 10000 > g x = int(runiform()*50) > g by = int(runiform()*20) > g w = int(runiform()*100) > g y = runiform() > > > **This works without an error: > tab x by [aw=w] > > **While this gives me r(134): > **adds Means, Standard Deviations, Frequencies to table cells > **tab x by [aw=w] , sum(y) //doesnt work > > **1. subset your data: > tab x by [aw=w] in 1/100, sum(y) mean //works > tab x by [aw=w] in 101/200, sum(y) mean //or use [if] > > *2. or collapse & reshape: > preserve > collapse (mean) y (sd) ysd=y [aw=w], by(x by) > reshape wide y ysd, i(x) j(by) > **outsheet, export, etc. > restore > ******************! > > > - Eric > __ > Eric A. Booth > Public Policy Research Institute > Texas A&M University > ebooth@ppri.tamu.edu > +979.845.6754 > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:25 AM, László Sándor wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am still fiddling around with -tab, sum()- (using Stata MP 12.1 for >> mac). I encountered some curious behavior that I could not track down. >> >> This works without an error: >> tab x by [aw=w] >> >> While this gives me r(134): >> tab x by [aw=w], sum(y) >> >> Why should there be a difference? Are these limits documented somewhere? >> >> FWIW, at the end I paste how I generated data for my particular test run. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Laszlo >> >> For reference, here is the help on this error: >> >> [P] error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Return code 134 >> too many values; >> 1) You attempted to encode a string variable that takes on >> more than 65,536 unique values. 2) You attempted to tabulate >> a variable or pair of variables that take on too many values. >> If you specified two variables, try interchanging them. >> 3) You issued a graph command using the by option. The >> by-variable takes on too many different values to construct >> a readable chart. >> >> >> set obs 1000 >> set seed 19821009 >> g y = rnormal() >> g y2 = rnormal() >> g by = y2 > 0.5 >> g w = runiform() >> g x = runiform() >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway-***From:*László Sándor <sandorl@gmail.com>

**Re: st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway-***From:*Eric Booth <eric.a.booth@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Binary choice model: Logit using IVs** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: passing indefinite no of arguments** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway-** - Index(es):