Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I think you need to back up a bit. You will need to take into account
the fact that the variance of the outcome is not constant across the
logit equations, in order to get unbiased estimates of c - c'.
Actually, I think it might be a better idea to do a path analysis with
-cmp- (i.e., test your full model simultaneously) and try to get
specific indirect effects for your two mediators from that model,
rather than estimating a global reduction in the direct effect, which
isn't very informative about where the mediational actions are taking
place. Anyway, I think you have some more homework to do before you
proceed with this analysis. See the following:
Karlson, A.F.B., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (December 23, 2010). Total,
Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit Models. CSER Working Paper
Series, No. 0005. Aarhus, Denmark: Centre for Strategic Educational
Research DPU, Aarhus
Buis, M.L. (2010). Direct and indirect effects in a logit model. The
Stata Journal, 10(1),
MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects
in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Brown, C.H., Wang, W., & Hoffman,
J.M. (2007). The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit
regression. Clinical Trials, 4(5),
Li, Y, Schneider, J.A., & Bennett, D.A. (2007). Estimation of the
mediation effect with a binary mediator. Statistics in Medicine,
Jasti, S., Dudley, W.N., & Goldwater, E. (2008). SAS macros for
testing statistical mediation in data with binary mediators or
outcomes. Nursing Research, 57(2), 118-122.
Huang, B., Sivaganesan, S., Succop, P., & Goodman, E. (2004).
Statistical assessment of mediational effects for logistic mediational
models. Statistics in Medicine, 23(17), 2713?2728.
Kuha, J., & Goldthorpe, J.H. (2010). Path analysis for discrete
variables: the role of education in social mobility. Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173(2),
Eshima, N., Tabata, M., & Zhi, G. (2001). Path analysis with logistic
regression models: effect analysis of fully recursive causal systems
of categorical variables. Journal of the Japanese Statistical Society,
31(1), 1-14. http://www.scipress.org/journals/jjss/pdf/3101/31010001.pdf
Roodman, D. (2011). Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process
models with cmp. The Stata Journal, 11(2),
2012/4/2 Fernanda Queiros <email@example.com>:
> Dear list participants,
> First of all, I am a PhD student with limited statistical knowledge
> compared to what I?ve seen here at the list. Also, English is not my
> first language; so, forgive me if any part of the message is not
> crystal clear.
> I am trying to estimate the mediation effect for an ordinal outcome
> with 10 levels (ladderw4). The two mediators I?m interested are
> categorical. My main independent variable (IV) is categorical (four
> levels), as well as all my co-variates. I am using complex survey
> data, with 132 PSU?s and 4 strata. I saw here at the list some
> suggestions applying econometrics methods to a question about testing
> mediation with categorical mediators, which is beyond my knowledge.
> Thus, I am trying to compute the difference of my main IV?s
> coefficients (from the models with and without the mediator) to
> measure the change and, therefore, mediation effect. I am thinking
> about using the jackknife procedure to estimate the variance of my
> coefficients. However, the problem I am facing is that I don?t know
> how to compute the variance of the difference?
> That is how I am establishing the survey design using Jackknife (Stata 11.2):
> . svyset psuscid [pweight=gswgt4_2], strata(region) vce(jackknife)
> I am, then, using svy: ologit to run my models: (1) without the
> mediator and (2) with it:
> (1) xi: svy,subpop(subpop2): ologit ladderw4 i.type_disability age_w4
> bio_sex_ i.racew1_r i.parented i.famst3
> (2) xi: svy,subpop(subpop2): ologit ladderw4 i.type_disability age_w4
> bio_sex_ i.racew1_r i.parented i.famst3 deprew1_dic
> The output gives me the ?final? coefficients and Jackknife SE?s for my
> IV?s. My question is:
> - Is there a way to get the coefficients/SE?s for each one of the 132
> replications Stata is running in this case? I think that with this
> information it would be possible to compute the variance of the
> difference between the two coefficients of my main IV...
> - Also, does any one have experience on testing mediation with
> similar types of variables (using complex survey data) and would
> suggest me a different approach from what I am trying to do?
> Looking forward to hearing your ideas/suggestions!
> Many thanks,
> Fernanda Queirós
> Me., Fonoaudióloga / M.S., Brazilian Speech-Language Pathologist
> Doutoranda - Bolsista CAPES/Fulbright / Ph.D. Candidate -
> CAPES/Fulbright grantee
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> Gillings School of Global Public Health
> Department of Maternal and Child Health
> Para ser grande, sê inteiro: nada teu exagera ou exclui. Sê todo em
> cada coisa. Põe quanto és
> no mínimo que fazes....
> (Fernando Pessoa)
Me., Fonoaudióloga / M.S., Brazilian Speech-Language Pathologist
Doutoranda - Bolsista CAPES/Fulbright / Ph.D. Candidate -
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Department of Maternal and Child Health
Para ser grande, sê inteiro: nada teu exagera ou exclui. Sê todo em
cada coisa. Põe quanto és
no mínimo que fazes....
* For searches and help try: