Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: a question about -gllamm- model


From   David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: a question about -gllamm- model
Date   Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:49:50 -0400

Andrew,

Have you looked at the documentation for -gllapred-?  I have the
impression that its options include what you are looking for.

To what extent do your data support changing that dichotomous
predictor from 0 to 1 while holding the other predictors constant?
You should check that you are not extrapolating beyond your data.  The
"held constant" interpretation generally oversimplifies what is going
on.

David Hoaglin

2012/3/25 Huaandrew <andrew0845@hotmail.com>:
> Hi Statalisters:
>
> Is there a way that I can estimate the changes in probability(the dependent variable) that result from changing a dichotomous independent variable from 0 to 1 (while holding all other independent variables constant) in a gllamm model? As far as I know, the gllamm model is not supported by Clarify. I believe that there is another way through Stata to complete this sort of simulation (under the estimated parameters of the model), but I do not know exactly how or what the exact command would be. Any insight you might have would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Andrew

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index