Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: nbreg vs zinb


From   Muhammad Anees <anees@aneconomist.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: nbreg vs zinb
Date   Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:33:50 +0500

Thanks Clive,

I am sure it is my post who you pointed at. Being a non-native English
student, I would be really careful for the next time.

The complete reference is as:

LONG, J.S. and Freese, J., 2001. Regression Models for Categorical
Dependent Variables Using Stata, Stata Corporation

Thanks Again
Anees

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:03 PM,  <clivelists@googlemail.com> wrote:
> You've now been on the list long enough not to scatter about names and years that aren't fully referenced. Read the Statalist FAQ again if you're not sure. Going by most of your posts, using a spellchecker wouldn't go amiss, either...
>
> C
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muhammad Anees <anees@aneconomist.com>
> Sender: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:42:20
> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
> Reply-To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.eduSubject: Re: st: nbreg vs zinb
>
> I would prefer NB model. You? I suggest read the Long and Freese notes
> carefully.
>
> Anees
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Simon Falck <simon.falck@abe.kth.se> wrote:
>> Dear Statlist,
>>
>> I´m regressing the number of start-ups, using count data.
>>
>> The data is clearly not Poisson.
>>
>> Hence, I am using nbreg and zinb models. I have some concern regarding what is the most appropriate model in my situation. Both seem relevant.
>>
>> Using the Long/Freese command, accordingly: countfit $dept $xlist, maxcount(10) nbreg zinb
>>
>> The Tests and Fit Statistics indicate that both nb and zinb may be preferred if BIC, AIC and Voung is consulted, although p>0.05.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> NBRM           BIC= -2071.543          AIC=     2.714       Prefer  Over      Evidence
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  vs ZINB      BIC= -2046.607            dif=   -24.935     NBRM    ZINB     Very strong
>>                      AIC=     2.720                 dif=    -0.005        NBRM    ZINB
>>                      Vuong=   1.292            prob=    0.098     ZINB      NBRM  p=0.098
>>
>> What would be your suggestion regarding choice of model in my situation?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> /Simon
>>
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best
> ---------------------------
> Muhammad Anees
> Assistant Professor/Programme Coordinator
> COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
> Attock 43600, Pakistan
> http://www.aneconomist.com
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



-- 

Best
---------------------------
Muhammad Anees
Assistant Professor/Programme Coordinator
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
Attock 43600, Pakistan
http://www.aneconomist.com

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index