Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Jen Zhen <jenzhen99@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Computing the Gini or another inequality coefficient from a limited number of data points |

Date |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:09 +0100 |

Dear Daniel and Austin, thanks a lot for your suggestions, these look very helpful and I will now look into them in detail! JZ On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: > Jen Zhen <jenzhen99@gmail.com>: > ssc install dagfit > help dagfit > > for a start, then read the items referred to in that help file. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Jen Zhen <jenzhen99@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear list members, >> >> I would like to compute a measure of income inequality similar to the >> Gini index. I do not know everyone's income, so need to make an >> approximation. >> >> (1) >> For the 5 most recent years, I know for 6 income brackets how many >> individuals there are and their joint income, hence also the average >> income in the bracket. For the full-fledged Gini index I would need to >> know the area under the curve which shows the cumulative income >> against the cumulative number of tax payers (to visualize what I mean, >> look e.g. at the 2nd figure here: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_index). >> Now I believe that with the information I have I don't know the entire >> curve but I know only 7 points on it (the six points mentioned plus >> the origin). So I think I can approximate the said area if I simply >> assume that between the 7 points the line is straight, but that will >> systematically underestimate the true degree of inequality. So I'm >> wondering if there is a sensible way to smooth the curve and hence get >> a better approximation? >> >> (2) >> For the 5 earliest years unfortunately I know only the number of >> individuals in each bracket but not their joint income. So my idea was >> that I would regress the mean income in each bracket on a 3rd-order >> function in the year to see how it develops in the 5 latest years and >> use this to predict/estimate the mean income for each bracket in the 5 >> earlier years, then use the procedure described in (1). A simpler >> alternative would be to just use the midpoint of each bracket, but I >> guess this would be less good. >> >> Does this procedure sound sensible? Or is there a better way to >> compute inequality from these data? >> >> Thank you so much and best regards, >> JZ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Computing the Gini or another inequality coefficient from a limited number of data points***From:*Jen Zhen <jenzhen99@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Computing the Gini or another inequality coefficient from a limited number of data points***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: rearrange table** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Getting variable names in a matrix** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Computing the Gini or another inequality coefficient from a limited number of data points** - Next by thread:
**st: Computing the Gini or another inequality coefficient from a limited number of data points** - Index(es):